<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of History and Culture</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-706X</Issn>
				<Volume>54</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evolution of Approached in Sīra Scholarship in Shīʿī Studies</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evolution of Approached in Sīra Scholarship in Shīʿī Studies</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>88</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">43660</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22067/jhistory.2023.79497.1179</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mardani Golestani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Qurʾanic Sciences and Ja’farī Fiqh, Razavi Islamic Sciences Research School, Islamic Research Foundation of Astan Quds Razavi, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		    <Abstract> 
Understanding different approaches in Sīra research enables us to categorize different perspectives and compare them, allowing for a logical encounter with the proposed questions and challenges. The present study aims at investigaitng the historical evolution of Sīra research using the descriptive-analytical approach and based on Shīʿī studies. The results indicate that three main approaches dominate Sīra research: First, the Fiqhī approach, which considers Sīra as a source for deducing decrees; Second, the Ḥadīth approach, which considers Sīra as a role model and example for life; and third, the Historical appraoch which considers Sīra as a report of historical events.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"> 
Understanding different approaches in Sīra research enables us to categorize different perspectives and compare them, allowing for a logical encounter with the proposed questions and challenges. The present study aims at investigaitng the historical evolution of Sīra research using the descriptive-analytical approach and based on Shīʿī studies. The results indicate that three main approaches dominate Sīra research: First, the Fiqhī approach, which considers Sīra as a source for deducing decrees; Second, the Ḥadīth approach, which considers Sīra as a role model and example for life; and third, the Historical appraoch which considers Sīra as a report of historical events.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sīra studies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sīra ʾAhl al-Bayt</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">approaches to Sīra research</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fiqhī approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ḥadīth approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Historical Approach</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jhistory.um.ac.ir/article_43660_b6f94d0f54cf94a6a70af82a57c7c130.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
