Typology and Classification of Swords in Khorasan Grand (Khurāsān-i Buzurg) Museum

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Hasan Nami ¹
• Farzane Forouzan Nia ²
• Seyed Ebrahim Rayegani ³
• Mohammad Sadegh Davari ⁴

¹ Assistant Professor, department of archeology, faculty of literature and humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran

² MA Student, department of archeology, faculty of literature and humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran

³ Associate Professor, department of archeology, faculty of literature and humanities, University of Neyshabur, Neyshabur, Iran

⁴ PhD Candidate, Prehistoric Studies, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

10.22067/jhistory.2024.88483.1311

Abstract

The formation and development of civilization from prehistoric times up to now is largely indebted to the discovery of metal. As early as the sixth and fifth millennia BCE, humans used metal to craft tools and weapons, and the practice persists to this day. As human knowledge advanced, the role of metal in shaping developments in agriculture, transportation, arts, and industries became more significant. Making weapons and metal arms is considered as a branch of metallurgy. However, due to the limited archeological research in the area, no focused research has been conducted on the weaponry of the Khurāsān region. With the establishment of the Khurāsān Museum, some of the metal weapons stored in the National Museum of Iran were transferred to this museum, most of which were seized from antiquities smugglers and therefore lacking in scientific documentation regarding their history and dating. The present study aims at establishing a relative chronology and understanding the cultural contexts of the analyzed swords. These objects are some of the cultural materials that lack proper documentation, therefore making scientific study and chronological analysis a necessity. The present study initially introduces, and then describes and classifies the swords in this collection of weaponry. Finally, the study employs the comparative approach to evaluate the dating and cultural context of the swords. The findings reveal the existence of five distinct classes of metal swords, with their relative chronology ranging from the Iron Age to the late historical period (according to comparative analysis).  These objects are composed of bronze, iron, or a combination of both metals, and their structure and appearance resemble those of objects discovered in north-central, north-western, and western regions of the Iranian plateau. However, a lack of in-situ archeological research has made attributing these objects to specific regions a challenging task.

Keywords

• Khurāsān museum
• weaponry
• Iron Age
• Bronze Age
• comparative study

Main Subjects

• Other

---

References

Bakhshandahfard, Ḥamīd Riżā; Muḥammadī, Surayā va Hūmān Bakhshandahfard. “Fan Shinākht va Barrasī Āsīb dar Shamshīr Mafraghī-Āḥanī bi Dast Āmadih az Kāvush-hā-yi Manṭaqah Tul Tālish”. Majallah-yi Muṭāliʿāt Bāstānshināsī Pārsih 7, no. 24 (2023/1402): 79-96.

Burḥān, Muḥammad Ḥusayn  ibn Khalaf. “Shamshīr”. Dar Farhang Fārsī Burḥān Qāṭiʿ, Tehran: Nīmā, 2000/1379.

Calmeyer, Peter. Mafragh-hā-yi Qābil Tārīkhguzārī Luristān va Kirmānshāh. translated by Muḥammad ʿĀṣimī. Tehran: Intishārāt-i  Sāzimām-i Mīrās Farhangī Kishvar, 1997/1376.

Dādras, Nāhīd. Muʿarifī va Taqsīmbandī Anwāʿ Jang Afzār-hā-yi ʿAṣr Āhan Irān (Shumāl, Shumāl Gharb va Gharb az 1500 BC tā 550 BC). Master Thesis, Supervisor  Rūḥ Allāh Shīrāzī. Dānishkadah-yi Adabīyāt va ʻUlūm Insānī, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, 2014/1392.

Dawlatī, Maryam; Askgarkāfī, Farnāz va Parīsā Nikūyī. “Muʿarifī, Gūnihshināsī va Gāhnigārī Nisbī Ashyā ʾ Filizī Guristān Ṣarm”. Majallah-yi Payām Bāstānshinās 13, no. 25 (2016/1395): 29-49.

Ḥājī Tabār, Majīd va Mītrā Ḥājī. “Gūnihshināsī Shamshīr-hā-yi Mawsūm bi Fīl Gūsh dar ʿAṣr Āhan II Irān bar Asās Majmūʿah-yi Mūzah-hā-yi Bunyād Mustażʿafān”. Pazhūhishnāmah Irān-i Bāstān 1, no. 1 (2022/1401): 41-66.

Iḥsānī, Muḥammad Taqī. Haft Hizār Sāl Hunar Filizkārī dar Irān. Tehran: Intishārāt-i ʻIlmī va Farhangī, 1989/1368.

Medvedskaia, I. N.  Irān dar ʿAṣr Āhan 1. translated by ʻAlī Akbar Vaḥdatī. Tehran: Sāzimām-i Mīrās Farhangī va Gardishgarī, 2006/1384.

Muʿīn, Muḥammad. Farhand Fārsī. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr, 1982/1361.

Mulāzādah, Khāẓim. “Tārīkhchih Piydāyish Fan Tavlīd Āhan va Kārburd ān dar Irān”. Majallah-yi Pazhūhish-hā-yi Tārīkhī 3 (2008 /1387): 177-199.

Murtażavī, Mahdī. Sayr-i Taḥavvūl  Silāḥ dar Dawrān-hā-yi Tārīkhī Irān az Ibtidā-yi Dawrah-yi Hakhānanishīyān tā Pāyān Dawrah-yi Sāsānīyān. Master Thesis, Supervisor Muḥammad  Raḥīm Ṣarāf. Tehran: Dānishkadah-yi Adabīyāt va ʻUlūm Insānī, Tarbiat Modares University, 1996/1375.

Muscrella. O. W. “Shumāl Gharb Irān dar Guzar az ʿAṣr Mafragh bi Āhan”. translated by ʻAlī Akbar Vaḥdatī. Majallah-yi Bāstānpazhūhī 12 (2004/1383): 62-74.

Mushtāq Khurāsānī, Manūchihr  va Dāryūsh Akbarzādah. “Gustarish Shamshīr-hā-yi Sāsānī (bar Pāyih-yi Sikkah-hā, Āsār Zarīn va Sīmīn va Naqsh Barjastah”. Majallah-yi Muṭāliʿāt Bāstānshināsī Pārsih 7, no. 24 (2023/1402): 127-166.

Nable, R. “Taḥlīl Sanjishī Ālīyāzh-hā-yi Misī Razmafzār-hā-yi Irān Bāstān (Yik Majmūʿah-yi Khuṣūṣī dar United States of America”. Majallah-yi Muṭāliʿāt Bāstānshināsī Pārsih 7, no. 24 (2023/1402): 63-78.

Pūrbakhshandah, Khusrū. Guzārish Tūṣīfī Muqaddamātī Dūvumīn Faṣl-i Kāvsuh-hā-yi Bāstānshinākhtī Guristān Ṣarm Kahak-Qum. Ārshīw Pazhūhishkadah-yi Bāstānshināsī (Muntashir Nashudih), 2003/1381.

Sarafrāz, ʻAlī Akbar va Āvarzamānī, Farīdūn. Sikkah-hā-yi Irān az Āghāz tā Dawrān Zandīyah. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Samt, 2013/1391.

Ṭalāyī, Ḥasan. ʿAṣr Āhan Irān. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Samt, 2009/1387.

Ṭalāyī, Ḥasan. ʿAṣr Mafragh Irān. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Samt, 2013/1391.

Tawhīdī, Fāʾiq. Fan va Hunar Filizkārī dar Irān. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Samt, 2015/1394.